Processing Math: Done
Lösung 2.2:3e
Aus Online Mathematik Brückenkurs 2
(Unterschied zwischen Versionen)
K |
|||
Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
If we differentiate the denominator in the integrand | If we differentiate the denominator in the integrand | ||
+ | {{Displayed math||<math>(x^2+1)' = 2x</math>}} | ||
- | + | we obtain almost the same expression as in the numerator; there is a constant 2 which is different. We therefore rewrite the numerator as | |
- | + | {{Displayed math||<math>3x = \frac{3}{2}\cdot 2x = \frac{3}{2}\cdot (x^2+1)',</math>}} | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | <math>3x=\frac{3}{2}\ | + | |
so the integral can be written as | so the integral can be written as | ||
+ | {{Displayed math||<math>\int\frac{\tfrac{3}{2}}{x^2+1}\cdot (x^{2}+1)'\,dx\,,</math>}} | ||
- | + | and we see that the substitution <math>u=x^2+1</math> can be used to simplify the integral, | |
- | + | ||
- | and we see that the substitution | + | |
- | <math>u=x^ | + | |
- | can be used to simplify the integral | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
+ | {{Displayed math||<math>\begin{align} | ||
+ | \int \frac{3x}{x^2+1}\,dx | ||
+ | &= \left\{ \begin{align} | ||
+ | u &= x^2+1\\[5pt] | ||
+ | du &= (x^2+1)'\,dx = 2x\,dx | ||
+ | \end{align}\right\}\\[5pt] | ||
+ | &= \frac{3}{2}\int \frac{du}{u}\\[5pt] | ||
+ | &= \frac{3}{2}\ln |u|+C\\[5pt] | ||
+ | &= \frac{3}{2}\ln |x^{2}+1|+C\\[5pt] | ||
+ | &= \frac{3}{2}\ln (x^{2}+1) + C\,\textrm{.} | ||
+ | \end{align}</math>}} | ||
- | In the last step, we take away the absolute sign around the argument in | + | In the last step, we take away the absolute sign around the argument in <math>\ln</math>, because <math>x^2+1</math> is always greater than or equal to 1. |
- | <math>\ln </math>, because | + | |
- | <math>x^ | + | |
- | is always greater than or equal to | + | |
- | + |
Version vom 14:53, 28. Okt. 2008
If we differentiate the denominator in the integrand
![]() |
we obtain almost the same expression as in the numerator; there is a constant 2 which is different. We therefore rewrite the numerator as
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
so the integral can be written as
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
and we see that the substitution
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In the last step, we take away the absolute sign around the argument in