Processing Math: Done
To print higher-resolution math symbols, click the
Hi-Res Fonts for Printing button on the jsMath control panel.
No jsMath TeX fonts found -- using image fonts instead.
These may be slow and might not print well.
Use the jsMath control panel to get additional information.
jsMath Control PanelHide this Message

jsMath

Lösung 2.2:2b

Aus Online Mathematik Brückenkurs 2

(Unterschied zwischen Versionen)
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
K
K (Robot: Automated text replacement (-{{Displayed math +{{Abgesetzte Formel))
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
If we set <math>u=2x+3</math>, the integral simplifies to <math>e^u</math>. However, this is only part of the truth. We must in addition take account of the relation between the integration element <math>dx</math> and <math>du</math>, which can give undesired effects. In this case, however, we have
If we set <math>u=2x+3</math>, the integral simplifies to <math>e^u</math>. However, this is only part of the truth. We must in addition take account of the relation between the integration element <math>dx</math> and <math>du</math>, which can give undesired effects. In this case, however, we have
-
{{Displayed math||<math>du = (2x+3)'\,dx = 2\,dx</math>}}
+
{{Abgesetzte Formel||<math>du = (2x+3)'\,dx = 2\,dx</math>}}
which only affects by a constant factor, so the substitution <math>u = 2x+3</math> seems to work, in spite of everything,
which only affects by a constant factor, so the substitution <math>u = 2x+3</math> seems to work, in spite of everything,
-
{{Displayed math||<math>\begin{align}
+
{{Abgesetzte Formel||<math>\begin{align}
\int\limits_0^{1/2} e^{2x+3}\,dx &= \left\{\begin{align}
\int\limits_0^{1/2} e^{2x+3}\,dx &= \left\{\begin{align}
u &= 2x+3\\[5pt]
u &= 2x+3\\[5pt]

Version vom 13:01, 10. Mär. 2009

If we set u=2x+3, the integral simplifies to eu. However, this is only part of the truth. We must in addition take account of the relation between the integration element dx and du, which can give undesired effects. In this case, however, we have

du=(2x+3)dx=2dx

which only affects by a constant factor, so the substitution u=2x+3 seems to work, in spite of everything,

120e2x+3dx=udu=2x+3=2dx=2143eudu=21 eu 43=21e4−e3.


Note: Another possible substitution is u=e2x+3 which also happens to work (usually, such an extensive substitution almost always fails).

Von „http://wiki.math.se/wikis/2009/bridgecourse2-TU-Berlin/index.php/L%C3%B6sung_2.2:2b“